Core i7-8750H vs Ryzen 7 4800U
Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4800U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
57.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
356.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
16.53k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
24.67k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
9.04k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
7.68k (x1.05)
TOTAL
53.41k
57.92k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-8750H
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
121.96k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
162.82k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
68.25k (x2.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.79k (x1)
TOTAL
231.9k
356.81k (x1.54)
Performance/W
i7-8750H
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
8131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
10854 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
4550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
252 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
23788 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
3936 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
2153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
13790 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4