| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.01k
3.8k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
17.38k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.17k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
3.16k (x0.56)
TOTAL
24.12k
29.52k (x1.22)

Multithread

i7-8750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
15.28k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
29.99k
76.44k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.66k
27.48k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.12k
3.02k (x0.59)
TOTAL
52.18k
122.2k (x2.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.14k
13.04k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
22.35k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.37k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
3.4k (x0.31)
TOTAL
54.41k
44.15k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-8750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
82.81k
56.49k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
118.58k
100.74k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.08k
28.21k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.86k
3.04k (x0.63)
TOTAL
231.34k
188.49k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
14.2k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
23.23k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.35k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
5.18k (x0.71)
TOTAL
53.41k
47.96k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-8750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
58.24k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
105.72k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
28.73k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
5.59k (x1.47)
TOTAL
231.9k
198.27k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4