| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.3 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8750H
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.01k
3.95k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
18.36k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.39k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
17.35k (x3.07)
TOTAL
24.12k
45.06k (x1.87)

Multithread

i7-8750H

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
19.47k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
29.99k
77.19k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.66k
15.4k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.12k
12.25k (x2.39)
TOTAL
52.18k
124.3k (x2.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
14.63k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
24.09k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.51k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
15.86k (x2.17)
TOTAL
53.41k
60.09k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-8750H

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
48.75k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
80.1k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
24.5k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
19.85k (x5.23)
TOTAL
231.9k
173.2k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4