Core i7-8700k vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i7-8700k is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700k gets a score of 443.8 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8700k is 1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700k gets a score of 443.8 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8700k is 1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2017
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.6k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
443.77k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8700k
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
31.2k
21.2k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
27.82k
25k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.57k
11.44k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
15k
24.22k (x1.61)
TOTAL
80.6k
81.87k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-8700k
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
202.42k
145.13k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
186.33k
198.36k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.96k
85.67k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
5.79k (x0.58)
TOTAL
443.77k
434.96k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i7-8700k
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1961 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
4671 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8700k
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6639 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5919 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3192 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
17148 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4