| | | | | | |

Core i7-8700 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700 gets a score of 389 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.01k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
388.95k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8700
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.48k
3.52k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
18.31k
8.68k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
2.83k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.45k
3.13k (x0.23)
TOTAL
42.12k
18.17k (x0.43)

Multithread

i7-8700

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
27.35k
32.7k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
124.94k
105.18k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.23k
35.18k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
9.54k (x1.35)
TOTAL
202.61k
182.59k (x0.9)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-8700
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.45k
11.08k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
9.57k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
3.18k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.43k
3.28k (x0.24)
TOTAL
59.86k
27.11k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-8700

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
100.94k
139.07k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
159.09k
133.47k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.61k
46.6k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
6.65k (x1.01)
TOTAL
310.23k
325.78k (x1.05)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8700
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.57k
11.18k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
25.52k
10.06k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
3.21k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.82k
3.12k (x0.24)
TOTAL
60.92k
27.57k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-8700

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
101.85k
140.98k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
170.31k
145.37k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.12k
45.62k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.11k
6.75k (x0.95)
TOTAL
322.39k
338.73k (x1.05)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8700
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.25k
18.62k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
10.49k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
4.04k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.74k
3.26k (x0.24)
TOTAL
75.01k
36.41k (x0.49)

Multithread

i7-8700

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
182.56k
236.25k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
159.9k
151.05k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.18k
58.9k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
6.7k (x0.81)
TOTAL
388.95k
452.9k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i7-8700
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2809 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2460 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
587 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8700
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6358 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2986 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16307 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4