| | | | | | |

Core i7-8700 vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700 gets a score of 389 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8700 is 1.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
75.01k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
388.95k points
303.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8700
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.25k
14.08k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
25.98k
22.56k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
5.19k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.74k
16.71k (x1.22)
TOTAL
75.01k
58.53k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-8700

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
182.56k
86.62k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
159.9k
168.1k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.18k
43.51k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
5.16k (x0.62)
TOTAL
388.95k
303.4k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i7-8700
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
2809 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2460 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
587 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
4668 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8700
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6358 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2986 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
16307 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4