Core i7-8665U vs i5-10210U
Description
The i7-8665U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8665U gets a score of 109.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8665U gets a score of 109.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806ec
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
35.19k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.72k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8665U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.38k
22.96k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
13.43k
20.8k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
4.76k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
7.5k (x1.67)
TOTAL
35.19k
56.03k (x1.59)
Multithread
i7-8665U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.22k
66.43k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
46.99k
62.38k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
14.52k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.42k
4.45k (x0.82)
TOTAL
109.72k
147.78k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i7-8665U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3148 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
672 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
7314 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8665U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2799 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
599 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
936 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
7330 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4