Core i7-8665U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-8665U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8665U gets a score of 109.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8665U gets a score of 109.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
35.19k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.72k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8665U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.38k
16.04k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
13.43k
24.47k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
8.38k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
21.66k (x4.82)
TOTAL
35.19k
70.55k (x2.01)
Multithread
i7-8665U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.22k
113.63k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
46.99k
143.55k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
63.84k (x6.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.42k
27.34k (x5.04)
TOTAL
109.72k
348.35k (x3.18)
Performance/W
i7-8665U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3148 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
672 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7314 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8665U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2799 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
599 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
936 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
7330 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4