Core i7-8665U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i7-8665U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8665U gets a score of 109.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.8 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8665U gets a score of 109.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.8 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
35.19k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.72k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8665U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.38k
14.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
13.43k
23.23k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
5.35k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
5.18k (x1.15)
TOTAL
35.19k
47.96k (x1.36)
Multithread
i7-8665U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.22k
58.24k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
46.99k
105.72k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
28.73k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.42k
5.59k (x1.03)
TOTAL
109.72k
198.27k (x1.81)
Performance/W
i7-8665U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3148 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3133 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
672 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
7314 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8665U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2799 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
599 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
936 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
7330 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4