Core i7-8650U vs i5-5675R
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.1 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.1 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
40671
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
194.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
21.91k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
18.59k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.2k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
5.72k (x0.58)
TOTAL
55.86k
51.43k (x0.92)
Multithread
i7-8650U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
84.92k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
72.09k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
20.13k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
17.07k (x2.78)
TOTAL
173.49k
194.2k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4