Core i7-8650U vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.5 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.5 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Cezanne
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2017
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
21.2k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
25k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
11.44k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
24.22k (x2.44)
TOTAL
55.86k
81.87k (x1.47)
Multithread
i7-8650U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
145.13k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
198.36k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
85.67k (x5.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
5.79k (x0.94)
TOTAL
173.49k
434.96k (x2.51)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4