Core i7-8650U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
13.67k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
22.28k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.99k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
15.22k (x1.53)
TOTAL
55.86k
56.16k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-8650U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
81.03k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
145.84k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
39.14k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
6.79k (x1.1)
TOTAL
173.49k
272.8k (x1.57)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4