Core i7-8650U vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 2.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 2.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
10.73k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
18.15k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
3.99k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
3.89k (x0.39)
TOTAL
55.86k
36.77k (x0.66)
Multithread
i7-8650U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
20.11k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
36.87k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
10.74k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
3.31k (x0.54)
TOTAL
173.49k
71.02k (x0.41)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4