Core i7-8650U vs i7-1195G7
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806c2
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
239.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
30.89k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
25.57k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
10.64k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
15.66k (x1.57)
TOTAL
55.86k
82.77k (x1.48)
Multithread
i7-8650U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
96.34k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
95.75k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
32.29k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
15.2k (x2.47)
TOTAL
173.49k
239.58k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4