Core i7-8650U vs i7-1165G7
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
210.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
22.97k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
21.61k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
8.99k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
8.52k (x0.86)
TOTAL
55.86k
62.1k (x1.11)
Multithread
i7-8650U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
82.75k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
86.58k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
29.34k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
11.72k (x1.91)
TOTAL
173.49k
210.4k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
7514 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4