Core i7-8565U vs i9-9880H
Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2.7 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2.7 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
906ed
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16386 kB
Date
August 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
27.81k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
25.88k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.65k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
14.19k (x1.16)
TOTAL
67.83k
73.53k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-8565U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
175.69k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
166.56k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
35.04k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
4.23k (x1.08)
TOTAL
142.55k
381.53k (x2.68)
Performance/W
i7-8565U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4