Core i7-8565U vs i5-7200U
Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8565U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8565U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
806e9
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2018
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
19.34k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
17.47k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
4.08k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
4.04k (x0.33)
TOTAL
67.83k
44.94k (x0.66)
Multithread
i7-8565U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
42.86k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
41.3k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
9.69k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
3.68k (x0.94)
TOTAL
142.55k
97.52k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i7-8565U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4