Core i7-8565U vs i5-10500T
Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.1 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.1 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
a0653
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
302.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
25.16k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
22.28k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.18k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
11.97k (x0.98)
TOTAL
67.83k
64.6k (x0.95)
Multithread
i7-8565U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
144.86k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
120.98k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
32.55k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
3.73k (x0.95)
TOTAL
142.55k
302.13k (x2.12)
Performance/W
i7-8565U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4