| | | | | | |

Core i7-8565U vs i5-10210U


Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
806ec
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
22.96k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
20.8k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
4.76k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
7.5k (x0.61)
TOTAL
67.83k
56.03k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-8565U

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
66.43k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
62.38k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
14.52k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
4.45k (x1.13)
TOTAL
142.55k
147.78k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i7-8565U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4