| | | | | | |

Core i7-8565U vs i3-6006U


Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8565U is 2.1 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
406e3
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2018
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
68.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
12.89k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
11.72k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
2.74k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
3.95k (x0.32)
TOTAL
67.83k
31.3k (x0.46)

Multithread

i7-8565U

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
29.95k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
27.93k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
6.74k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
3.77k (x0.96)
TOTAL
142.55k
68.38k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i7-8565U
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
1997 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
1862 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
449 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
251 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
4559 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6444 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1371 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
1975 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
15649 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4