Core i7-8565U vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.6 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.6 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
800f11
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
13.72k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
22.48k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.12k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
15.44k (x1.26)
TOTAL
67.83k
56.76k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-8565U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
110.92k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
200.56k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
54.24k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
7.01k (x1.78)
TOTAL
142.55k
372.73k (x2.61)
Performance/W
i7-8565U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4