Core i7-8565U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
810f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
14.48k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
23.84k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.43k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
5.46k (x0.45)
TOTAL
67.83k
49.21k (x0.73)
Multithread
i7-8565U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
54.39k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
88.77k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
20.04k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
5.48k (x1.39)
TOTAL
142.55k
168.69k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i7-8565U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4