Core i7-8550U vs i5-10210U
Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
23.11k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.6k
20.58k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
4.73k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.1k
7.43k (x0.67)
TOTAL
64.2k
55.86k (x0.87)
Multithread
i7-8550U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
72.82k
65.84k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
71.71k
60.77k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.35k
14.45k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.44k (x1.05)
TOTAL
166.12k
145.51k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i7-8550U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4855 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4781 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
11075 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6343 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5650 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2774 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
16049 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4