| | | | | | |

Core i7-8550U vs i3-10100T


Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8550U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4.32k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
15.98k
15.7k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.04k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.05k
7.68k (x0.7)
TOTAL
36.05k
32.73k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.76k
16.59k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
50.15k
71.1k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.76k
23.26k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
3.86k (x0.93)
TOTAL
82.84k
114.81k (x1.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
13.84k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
20.59k
19.79k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
5.28k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
8.31k (x0.79)
TOTAL
49.41k
47.22k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
41.11k
54.67k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
65.04k
90.71k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.53k
24.11k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
3.85k (x0.91)
TOTAL
127.9k
173.34k (x1.36)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.15k
13.88k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
20.94k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.18k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.21k
8.2k (x0.89)
TOTAL
47.16k
48.19k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
34.13k
54.88k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
53.79k
93.17k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.91k
23.34k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.85k (x0.93)
TOTAL
105.95k
175.24k (x1.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
24.31k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.6k
22.15k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
5.14k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.1k
8.46k (x0.76)
TOTAL
64.2k
60.06k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
72.82k
101.48k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
71.71k
98.04k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.35k
24.28k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.86k (x0.91)
TOTAL
166.12k
227.67k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i7-8550U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4855 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4781 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
11075 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6343 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5650 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2774 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
16049 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4