| | | | | | |

Core i7-8550U vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8550U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
13.75k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.6k
22.58k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
4.99k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.1k
3.55k (x0.32)
TOTAL
64.2k
44.87k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-8550U

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
72.82k
50.99k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
71.71k
84.4k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.35k
18.95k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.2k (x0.75)
TOTAL
166.12k
157.54k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i7-8550U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4855 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4781 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
11075 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6343 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5650 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2774 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
16049 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4