Core i7-8086K vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
50654
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
18.78k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
16.25k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
3.99k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
6.8k (x0.52)
TOTAL
72.95k
45.82k (x0.63)
Multithread
i7-8086K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
133.55k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
108.43k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
30.02k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
9.48k (x1.06)
TOTAL
352.4k
281.48k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i7-8086K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4