Core i7-8086K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
95 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
18.62k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
10.49k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.04k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
3.26k (x0.25)
TOTAL
72.95k
36.41k (x0.5)
Multithread
i7-8086K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
236.25k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
151.05k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
58.9k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
6.7k (x0.75)
TOTAL
352.4k
452.9k (x1.29)
Performance/W
i7-8086K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4