Core i7-8086K vs i7-10870H
Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
30.38k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
27.95k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
6.51k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
14.37k (x1.09)
TOTAL
72.95k
79.2k (x1.09)
Multithread
i7-8086K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
216.18k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
210.82k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
51.57k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
8.47k (x0.95)
TOTAL
352.4k
487.05k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i7-8086K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4