| | | | | | |

Core i7-8086K vs i5-4690


Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 2.2 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
95 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2018
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
163.95k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
22.97k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
13.02k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.21k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
4.74k (x0.36)
TOTAL
72.95k
45.95k (x0.63)

Multithread

i7-8086K

i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
85.98k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
49.01k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
19.5k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
9.46k (x1.06)
TOTAL
352.4k
163.95k (x0.47)

Performance/W
i7-8086K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
1952 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4