| | | | | | |

Core i7-8086K vs i5-10600K


Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0655
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
352.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
30.11k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
26.16k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
6.01k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
10.77k (x0.82)
TOTAL
72.95k
73.05k (x1)

Multithread

i7-8086K

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
158.82k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
150.39k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
36.56k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
7.11k (x0.8)
TOTAL
352.4k
352.88k (x1)

Performance/W
i7-8086K
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4