Core i7-7700K vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700K gets a score of 289.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700K gets a score of 289.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2016
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.98k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.9k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
30.47k
21.2k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.94k
25k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
11.44k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.32k
24.22k (x1.82)
TOTAL
76.98k
81.87k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-7700K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
127.81k
145.13k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
123.7k
198.36k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
85.67k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
5.79k (x0.64)
TOTAL
289.9k
434.96k (x1.5)
Performance/W
i7-7700K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1345 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1302 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
309 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
3052 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6770 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2960 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
17106 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4