| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700K vs i5-11300H


Description
The i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700K gets a score of 289.9 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700K is 1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.98k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.9k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.47k
25.83k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
26.94k
23.56k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
9.2k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.32k
5.06k (x0.38)
TOTAL
76.98k
63.64k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-7700K

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
127.81k
116.87k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
123.7k
121.08k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
41.8k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
6k (x0.66)
TOTAL
289.9k
285.75k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i7-7700K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1345 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1302 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
309 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
3052 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6770 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2960 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
17106 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4