| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs i7-1065G7


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
28.19k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
22.13k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
10.32k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
14.17k (x1.79)
TOTAL
56.29k
74.82k (x1.33)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
86.39k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
86.22k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
32.99k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
8.75k (x1.79)
TOTAL
208.33k
214.34k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4