| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs i5-8365U


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
197.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
24.37k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
22.68k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.98k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
7.7k (x0.97)
TOTAL
56.29k
59.73k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
89.45k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
85.57k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
19.02k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
3.41k (x0.7)
TOTAL
208.33k
197.46k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
13164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4