Core i7-7700HQ vs i5-8265U
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806eb
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
24.32k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
20.35k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.38k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
8.52k (x1.08)
TOTAL
56.29k
57.57k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
65.17k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
63.6k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
14.4k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
6.31k (x1.29)
TOTAL
208.33k
149.48k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4