| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
4.05k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
15.49k
15.29k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
9.04k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.82k
10.54k (x1.19)
TOTAL
33.09k
38.92k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.15k
9.05k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
65.81k
33.88k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.41k
15.34k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
6.74k (x1.29)
TOTAL
107.57k
65.01k (x0.6)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
7.07k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
10.55k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.27k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
5.66k (x0.64)
TOTAL
47.55k
28.56k (x0.6)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
52.55k
25.28k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
86.47k
37.48k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.02k
17.77k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
6.92k (x1.28)
TOTAL
167.43k
87.45k (x0.52)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13k
13.9k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
20.34k
20.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
9.41k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.95k
10.59k (x1.52)
TOTAL
45.05k
54.03k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
52.7k
55.4k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
89.69k
59.01k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
22.83k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
6.7k (x1.56)
TOTAL
169.17k
143.94k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
25.53k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
19.99k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
9.31k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
10.81k (x1.37)
TOTAL
56.29k
65.64k (x1.17)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
58.46k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
57.31k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
20.1k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
6.81k (x1.39)
TOTAL
208.33k
142.69k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4