| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs i5-10300H


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13k
15.65k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
20.34k
23.13k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
5.66k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.95k
11.43k (x1.64)
TOTAL
45.05k
55.87k (x1.24)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.7k
26.77k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
89.69k
43.81k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
10.17k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
11.91k (x2.77)
TOTAL
169.17k
92.66k (x0.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
27.14k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
24.75k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.73k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
11.84k (x1.5)
TOTAL
56.29k
69.47k (x1.23)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
105.77k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
107.47k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
24.82k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
8.02k (x1.64)
TOTAL
208.33k
246.07k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4