| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs i3-2330M


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 169.2 k points while the i3-2330M gets 33.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 5.1 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
16.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
33.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
13k
5.61k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.34k
5.42k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
2.45k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.95k
2.53k (x0.36)
TOTAL
45.05k
16.02k (x0.36)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
52.7k
11.99k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
89.69k
11.42k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
5.8k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
4.07k (x0.95)
TOTAL
169.17k
33.28k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
1171 points/W
343 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1993 points/W
326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5351 points/GHz
2465 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1829 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
11857 points/GHz
7281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4