Core i7-7700HQ vs i3-10100
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
22.74k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
20.31k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.71k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
7.65k (x0.97)
TOTAL
56.29k
55.41k (x0.98)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
71.95k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
67.7k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
16.43k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
6.25k (x1.28)
TOTAL
208.33k
162.33k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4