| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs M-5Y10c


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 169.2 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.3 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
51k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
13k
7.22k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
20.34k
9.98k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
2.75k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.95k
2.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
45.05k
22.93k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
52.7k
15.07k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
89.69k
24.8k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
6.68k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
4.46k (x1.04)
TOTAL
169.17k
51k (x0.3)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
1171 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1993 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
10200 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5351 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1829 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
11857 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4