Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
15.48k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
22.82k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
8.63k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
7.17k (x0.91)
TOTAL
56.29k
54.11k (x0.96)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
117.98k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
146.43k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
65.54k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
4.77k (x0.97)
TOTAL
208.33k
334.72k (x1.61)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4