| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3.41k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
15.49k
15.96k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
4.69k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.82k
17.42k (x1.97)
TOTAL
33.09k
41.47k (x1.25)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.15k
20.88k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
65.81k
110.37k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.41k
39.25k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
6.66k (x1.28)
TOTAL
107.57k
177.16k (x1.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
13.83k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
23.16k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.15k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
15.18k (x1.92)
TOTAL
56.29k
57.33k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
83.44k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
161.53k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
40.62k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
6.72k (x1.37)
TOTAL
208.33k
292.31k (x1.4)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4