Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
14.08k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
22.56k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.19k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
16.71k (x2.11)
TOTAL
56.29k
58.53k (x1.04)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
86.62k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
168.1k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
43.51k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
5.16k (x1.05)
TOTAL
208.33k
303.4k (x1.46)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4