Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 2.7 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 2.7 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Dali
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
9.33k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
17.1k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.57k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
3.26k (x0.41)
TOTAL
56.29k
33.26k (x0.59)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
22.14k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
40.04k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
10.71k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
5k (x1.02)
TOTAL
208.33k
77.88k (x0.37)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4