| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.4 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
11.13k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
19.38k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.47k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
3.87k (x0.49)
TOTAL
56.29k
38.85k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
17.13k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
30.56k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
9.44k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
4.09k (x0.84)
TOTAL
208.33k
61.23k (x0.29)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4