Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3.89k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
15.49k
17.94k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
5.34k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.82k
6.62k (x0.75)
TOTAL
33.09k
33.79k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.15k
15.07k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
65.81k
66.84k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.41k
19.56k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
6.54k (x1.26)
TOTAL
107.57k
108.01k (x1)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
14.3k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
21.69k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.42k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
6.6k (x0.74)
TOTAL
47.55k
48k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
52.55k
55.45k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
86.47k
83.13k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.02k
20.76k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
6.58k (x1.22)
TOTAL
167.43k
165.91k (x0.99)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13k
13.05k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.34k
22.88k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
5.39k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.95k
7.31k (x1.05)
TOTAL
45.05k
48.63k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
52.7k
51.73k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
89.69k
87.74k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
20.74k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
6.57k (x1.53)
TOTAL
169.17k
166.79k (x0.99)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
14.48k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
23.84k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.43k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
5.46k (x0.69)
TOTAL
56.29k
49.21k (x0.87)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
54.39k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
88.77k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
20.04k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
5.48k (x1.12)
TOTAL
208.33k
168.69k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4