| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 167.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 2.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
100fa0
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
1.98k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
15.49k
4.57k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
2.57k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.82k
3.51k (x0.4)
TOTAL
33.09k
12.64k (x0.38)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.15k
11.86k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
65.81k
27.4k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.41k
15.39k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
3.46k (x0.66)
TOTAL
107.57k
58.11k (x0.54)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
5.17k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
5.33k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
2.76k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
3.51k (x0.39)
TOTAL
47.55k
16.77k (x0.35)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
52.55k
29.82k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
86.47k
30.79k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.02k
15.88k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
3.69k (x0.68)
TOTAL
167.43k
80.19k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1922 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
511 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
3721 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3620 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5182 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2347 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
12514 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4