| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 200.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
12 /24
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7700
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.23k
3.44k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
16.76k
9.54k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.21k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.23k
3.94k (x0.32)
TOTAL
38.64k
21.13k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-7700

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
73.17k (x4.38)
Test#2 (FP)
73.1k
230.83k (x3.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.76k
107.14k (x4.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.12k
7.99k (x1.12)
TOTAL
122.68k
419.12k (x3.42)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7700
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.33k
10.64k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
9.53k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.85k
4.12k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.52k
3.62k (x0.29)
TOTAL
55.64k
27.91k (x0.5)

Multithread

i7-7700

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
61.73k
252.69k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
99.91k
238.68k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
115.5k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.28k
10.98k (x1.18)
TOTAL
197.96k
617.84k (x3.12)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
10.53k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
9.98k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
4k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.07k
3.4k (x0.31)
TOTAL
55.69k
27.92k (x0.5)

Multithread

i7-7700

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
62.68k
247.05k (x3.94)
Test#2 (FP)
105.24k
264.43k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.35k
111.01k (x4.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
10.66k (x1.84)
TOTAL
200.07k
633.14k (x3.16)

Performance/W
i7-7700
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
964 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1619 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
405 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
3078 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5575 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2635 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
13259 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4