Core i7-7700 vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 200.1 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 200.1 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
206d7
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
8.76k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
7.35k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
3.86k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.07k
3.32k (x0.3)
TOTAL
55.69k
23.28k (x0.42)
Multithread
i7-7700
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
62.68k
78.51k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
105.24k
66.46k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.35k
36.42k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
3.88k (x0.67)
TOTAL
200.07k
185.26k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i7-7700
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
964 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1619 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
405 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
3078 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5575 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2635 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
13259 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4