| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700 vs i7-10610U


Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
23.1k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
20k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
4.61k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
8.94k (x0.78)
TOTAL
67.33k
56.65k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-7700

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
73.36k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
68.28k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
13.73k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
6.62k (x0.97)
TOTAL
257.52k
162k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i7-7700
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4